Simner, J., Mulvenna, C., Sagiv, N., Tsakanikos, E., Witherby, S. A., Fraser, C., Scott, K., & Ward, J. (2006). Synaesthesia: The prevalence of atypical cross-modal experiences. Perception, 35(8), 1024–1033. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5469
Bankieris, K., & Simner, J. (2015). What is the link between synaesthesia and sound symbolism? Cognition, 136, 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.013
Freeman, E. D. (2020). Hearing what you see: Distinct excitatory and disinhibitory mechanisms contribute to visually-evoked auditory sensations. Cortex, 131, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.06.014
BBC. (2014, September 17). Science & Nature – Horizon. BBC.
Eagleman, D. (2023, September 6). Wednesday is Indigo Blue. David Eagleman. https://eagleman.com/books/wednesday-is-indigo-blue/
Eagleman, D. M., Kagan, A. D., Nelson, S. S., Sagaram, D., & Sarma, A. K. (2007). A standardized test battery for the study of Synesthesia. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 159(1), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.07.012
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia–a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of consciousness studies, 8(12), 3-34.
Ozturk, O., Krehm, M., & Vouloumanos, A. (2013). Sound symbolism in infancy: Evidence for sound–shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.004
Styles, S. J., & Gawne, L. (2017). When does Maluma/takete fail? Two key failures and a meta-analysis suggest that phonology and phonotactics matter. I-Perception, 8(4), 204166951772480. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517724807
Ćwiek, A., Fuchs, S., Draxler, C., Asu, E. L., Dediu, D., Hiovain, K., Kawahara, S., Koutalidis, S., Krifka, M., Lippus, P., Lupyan, G., Oh, G. E., Paul, J., Petrone, C., Ridouane, R., Reiter, S., Schümchen, N., Szalontai, Á., Ünal-Logacev, Ö., Winter, B. (2021). The bouba/kiki effect is robust across cultures and writing systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 377(1841). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0390
Barton, D. N., & Halberstadt, J. (2017). A Social Bouba/Kiki Effect: A bias for people whose names match their faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 1013–1020. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1304-x
Sidhu, D. M., Pexman, P. M., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2016). From the bob/kirk effect to the Benoit/éric effect: Testing the mechanism of name sound symbolism in two languages. Acta Psychologica, 169, 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.011
BBC. (2021, July 29). Rick Astley rolls into a billion YouTube views. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-58011677
BBC. (2018, September 10). Rick Astley on the Rickroll meme that made him an online legend. BBC Scotland. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/5D3ZmWf1hJmCxCc5Vn0sS64/rick-astley-on-the-rickroll-meme-that-made-him-an-online-legend
Jones, R. (2021)。跨感官心理學:解鎖行為背後的知覺密碼,改變他人、提升表現的生活處方箋 (陳松筠譯)。商周出版。
可是海上的風就是比陸地上強上好幾倍,這麼香的風力來源怎麼能放著不用呢?來自挪威的公司 World Wide Wind 提出了一種浮標式風電機組,省去了海底工程的麻煩。這種風電機組採用垂直軸的設計,這樣機組就不會被海風吹著跑。整個裝置可以靠著海面下的配重平衡地直立在海面上,除了電纜之外不須要任何固定措施。這大大地擴展了離岸風電的發展空間。許多最佳的風場位在離岸較遠的深海區域,我們沒辦法在這些海床上豎立巨大的水平軸風車,這時候就可以透過漂浮式構造來擴張風電的勢力範圍。
同樣的,讓女性或少數族群擔綱過往由男性把持的英雄角色,也是在提供觀眾一種新的角色模板。例如哈利波特裡最聰明、能力最強的並不是被預言選上唯一能與佛地魔對抗的哈利,而是麻瓜出身的妙麗。先不討論作者 JK 羅琳近年與 LGBTQ 族群起的爭議,在 21 世紀初期,那位願意一拳揍上馬份鼻子、永遠是第一個想出困境解法的年輕女巫可是西方女性培力的代言人,成為許多年輕女孩嚮往與效仿的對象。
或許不是每部影視作品都能像哈利波特或迪士尼形塑一整個世代的社會風氣,又或者像人選之人這樣啟發前所未有的 Me Too 運動,但他們多少反映了我們現在身處的環境,同時為他的改變與延續做出一點貢獻。從這個角度去想,你會發現政治正確並不是現在才有的現象,而是從古至今一直都有的創作取向。而之所以「政治正確」會在現代引起如此大的爭議,其實還得歸功我們成功打破了刻板印象,以致於大家都有了「正確答案不只一種」的認知,這才會對與自身想法不同的答案表達質疑,不是嗎?
對了,你最近看過的戲劇作品中,哪些作品的性別呈現最深得你心呢?歡迎跟我們分享吧!我先說,我自己最愛的是《八尺門的辯護人》裡的 Leena 跟陳令秋,那你呢?
Corwin, H. J. (1998). Reading with empathy: The effect of self-schema and gender-role identity on readers’ empathic identification with literary characters (Order No. 9937004). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (304459026). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/30…
Giezrzynski, A., & Eddy, K. (2013). Harry Potter and the Millennials: Research Methods and the Politics of the Muggle Generation. JHU Press.
Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of personality and social psychology, 103(1), 1.
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 2013, 342.6156: 377-380.
Klodt, J. E. (2003). Sex, drugs, and self-destruction: Reading decadence and identity in spain’s youth narrative.
Todd, A. R., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014). Perspective‐taking as a strategy for improving intergroup relations: Evidence, mechanisms, and qualifications. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 374-387.
Green, M. C., & Jenkins, K. M. (2014). Interactive narratives: Processes and outcomes in user-directed stories. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 479-500.
England, D. E., Descartes, L., & Collier-Meek, M. A. (2011). Gender role portrayal and the Disney princesses. Sex roles, 64, 555-567.
Streiff, M., & Dundes, L. (2017). Frozen in time: How Disney gender-stereotypes its most powerful princess. Social Sciences, 6(2), 38.
Garabedian, J. (2015). Animating gender roles: How Disney is redefining the modern princess. James Madison Undergraduate Research Journal (JMURJ), 2(1), 4.
Hoerrner, K. L. (1996). Gender roles in Disney films: Analyzing behaviors from Snow White to Simba. Women’s studies in communication, 19(2), 213-228.
Wiersma, B. A. (2000). The gendered world of Disney: A content analysis of gender themes in full-length animated Disney feature films. South Dakota State University.
Hunt, S. (2015). Representations of gender and agency in the Harry Potter series. In Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora (pp. 266-284). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Hoerrner, K. L. (1996). Gender roles in Disney films: Analyzing behaviors from Snow White to Simba. Women’s studies in communication, 19(2), 213-228.
Bem, S. L. (1983). Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: Raising gender-aschematic children in a gender-schematic society. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 8(4), 598-616.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological review, 88(4), 354.
Starr, C. R., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2017). Sandra Bem’s gender schema theory after 34 years: A review of its reach and impact. Sex Roles, 76, 566-578.